On May 9, the Supreme Court chose not to intervene in the Calcutta High Court’s ruling, which stated that CCTV cameras cannot be installed in a shared home without the unanimous consent of all residents.
A bench consisting of Justices Dipankar Datta and Manmohan rejected the Special Leave Petition that challenged the High Court’s decision.
The case stemmed from a dispute between two brothers, with one objecting to the unilateral installation of CCTV cameras by the other in their jointly owned property. The cameras were reportedly installed to monitor valuable collections and safeguard rare antiques stored in the house.
The High Court ruled that installing CCTV cameras in the residential area of a home without the consent of co-occupants or co-trustees infringes upon their right to privacy. This ruling was issued by a division bench consisting of Justices Sabyasachi Bhattacharya and Uday Kumar.
“In Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anr. vs Union of India, AIR 2017 SC 4161, the Supreme Court has ruled unanimously that the right to privacy of every individual is guaranteed and protected by Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, as it is an intrinsic part of the right to life and personal liberty. The dignity, autonomy and identity of an individual shall be respected and cannot be violated in any condition. The right to privacy is also recognized as a fundamental right in International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. This right is fundamental to protect the inner sphere of the individual.
Therefore, we are of the view that installation and operation of CCTV cameras inside the residential portion of dwelling house without the consent of co-trustee/appellant would amount to restrictions in his right to free enjoyment of property, and violation of the appellant’s right to privacy.’
Consequently, the High Court directed the removal of five CCTV cameras installed within the residential area, as they were deemed to violate the appellant’s right to property and dignity.
