The Delhi High Court recently observed that if a wife insists her husband to live apart from his family without any justified reason, it can be taken as an act of cruelty.
A Bench of two justices (Suresh Kumar Kait and Neena Bansal Krishna) made the observation while dissolving a marriage on the grounds of cruelty and desertion, after the wife has no objection to divorce.
The Court order stated, “the respondent has not been able to show any justifiable reason for her insistence to have separate residence, however, this is brought forth from an out-of-court settlement which the parties have entered into to live separately but thereafter, she went back to live in the matrimonial home with other family members. The only inference that can be drawn is that her insistence to live separately from the other family members was whimsical and had no justifiable reason. Such persistent insistence can only be termed as an act of cruelty.“
The Court relied on the Supreme Court’s 2016 judgment in Narendra v. K Meena, that held that, “it is not a common practice or desirable culture for a Hindu son in India to get separated from the parents upon getting married at the instance of the wife.“
The apex court verdict had stated, “In India, generally people do not subscribe to the western thought, where upon getting married or attaining majority; the son gets separated from the family. In normal circumstances, the wife is expected to be a part of the family of the husband after her marriage. She becomes integral to and forms part of the family and husband and normally without any justifiable strong reason, she should never insist that her husband should get separated from the family and live with her separately.“
The High Court observed it while hearing an appeal challenging a family court order rejecting the husband’s plea for divorce. The husband also claimed that his wife had subjected him to cruelty and desertion.
The couple got married in November 2000 and had two children out of this marriage. In 2003, the wife left her marital home but returned later. However, she left her matrimonial home again in July 2007.
The family court highlighted in its order that there was no evidence to support the claim that the wife had left her matrimonial home without a valid reason. Furthermore, the family court opined that the husband failed to demonstrate the wife’s intention to end their marriage permanently.
The High Court, however, found that the wife’s insistence to live separately from the other family members was whimsical and there was no justifiable reason involved in it.
From 2007 onwards, the wife had not fulfilled her marital responsibilities and the husband was denied conjugal rights, it was remarked.
The judges also took note of the wife’s statement before the High Court that she had no intention to reunite with her husband and she also had no objection to terminating the relationship permanently.
The Court also noted, “Prolonged deprivation of conjugal rights coupled with the statement of the respondent in the Court that she has no intention to join the company of the appellant and has no objection to the grant of divorce, not only reinforces that such deprivation has resulted in mental cruelty to the appellant, but also reveals that the respondent/wife has no intention whatsoever to resume the matrimonial relationship.“
Eventually, the Court dissolved the marriage and permitted the husband’s appeal for a divorce.
Source: https://www.barandbench.com/news/wife-insistence-living-separately-husband-family-without-reasons-cruelty-delhi-high-court
You May Also Like:
How Indian Courts Define A Married Woman’s Rightful Place 
Hindu Marriage Act 1955 
Coercing a husband to sever ties with his parents, labeling him as jobless and cowardly constitutes cruelty: Calcutta High Court 
Wife not obliged to live in the matrimonial home while husband keeps another lady: Himachal Pradesh High Court