A family court in Pune recently rejected a 46-year-old woman’s request for interim alimony, citing her stable income as a teacher and the fact that both of their children are now adults. The court also highlighted that the father was covering the educational expenses for their younger son.
The woman, who earns Rs. 7,000 per month as a teacher and an additional Rs. 60,000-65,000 from private tuition, had sought Rs. 25,000 per month in interim alimony. The husband’s lawyer argued that his income was lower than hers and, with both children now adults and the elder son employed, there was no necessity for maintenance.
The couple, married for over 25 years, has two children, aged 25 and 17. The wife has filed for divorce under the Domestic Violence Act and the Hindu Marriage Act, alleging physical, mental, and financial abuse by her husband.
Judge S. N. Rukme rejected the wife’s application, considering factors such as income, employment status, and financial independence. This ruling underscores the importance of individual circumstances in maintenance claims.
